Assalamu alaikum all Islamic brothers and sisters
Islamunity felt much depressed by the forgeries of some blind hindus who started saying that Kaba was was once a hindu temple.
Lets start staring at their theories...
1. Their 1st claim is...
"A recent archeological find in Kuwait unearthed a gold-plated statue of the Hindu deity Ganesh."
They accept that Kaba was a hindu temple some 2000 years ago. Let them show us the proofs that gold-plating was present in that ancient age."The early history of electrodeposition of precious metals onto lesser metal can be reliably traced back to around 1800." artisanplating.com says...
And regarding electroless plating, ENCYCLOPEDIA Britannica says,
"Discovered in 1944 by A. Brenner and G.E. Riddell, electroless plating involves the deposition of such metals as copper, nickel, silver, gold, or palladium on the surface of a variety of materials by means of a reducing chemical bath"
Even if we accept that the gold-plating technique was present even then, still an idol 2000 years old must have lost all its golden surface so much that the gold plating must be irrecognisible.
It simply suggests us that some hindu culprit went to Kuwait and buried this idol and informed the archeologists of an idol might-be-present there.
It can happen simply because they can visit Kuwait. but since they can't go near Kaba anyway, they poor fellows failed to show such a dirty proof in Makka.
Again, it is very much easy to tag any stone Ganesha just like his imaginary father Shiva. Every stone that have tubulor projection over it is their Ganesha. shame be upon their diety and the stupid followers.
2. The stupid forger of all this theory P.N.Oak says that he found the text inscribed on a dish hanging inside Kaba through a record on page no. 315 of Sayar-ul-Okul treasured in the Makhtab-e-Sultania library in Istanbul, Turkey,
"Fortunate are those who were born (and lived) during king Vikram’s reign. He was a noble, generous dutiful ruler, devoted to the welfare of his subjects. But at that time we Arabs, oblivious of God, were lost in sensual pleasures. Plotting and torture were rampant. The darkness of ignorance had enveloped our country. Like the lamb struggling for her life in the cruel paws of a wolf we Arabs were caught up in ignorance. The entire country was enveloped in a darkness so intense as on a new moon night. But the present dawn and pleasant sunshine of education is the result of the favour of the noble king Vikramaditya whose benevolent supervision did not lose sight of us- foreigners as we were. He spread his sacred religion amongst us and sent scholars whose brilliance shone like that of the sun from his country to ours. These scholars and preceptors through whose benevolence we were once again made cognisant of the presence of God, introduced to His sacred existence and put on the road of Truth, had come to our country to preach their religion and impart education at king Vikramaditya’s behest."
we tried to search for any information regarding any such book on yahoo.com.
See what is the result...
There is not a single mention of the book except the numurous webpages created by hindu stupids.
Go to the next page...
Go upto the 10th search page...
Nothing such has been there at all other than hindu forgeries.
Anyway, lets read what this forging say: -
An Arab is praising King vikramaditya for his sending hindu scholars to Arabia and insults his own ancestors.
Lets see what he says further, "But the present dawn and pleasant sunshine of education is the result of the favour of the noble king Vikramaditya whose benevolent supervision did not lose sight of us- foreigners as we were."
Calling himself as foreigner. Nobody calls himslef as a foreigner and rather he would have called Vikramditya a foreigner. He is explaining the stry from his side not from the side of vikrmaditya.
It simply tell us that the hindu forger forgot to be totally an arab while forging it. He just unknowingly slided to hindu side and called arabians as foreigner.
Simply bacause every forgery leaves some stray clues and hence is caught after thorough inspection.
Same happened to P.N.Oak!
Big forgery. Even bigger than that of World Trade Centre!
3. Based on this forgery, Mr. Oak concludes,
"That the knowledge of Indian arts and sciences was imparted by Indians to the Arabs directly by founding schools, academies and cultural centres."
Means hindus exported their art and science to arabs.
You know how difficult is that!
It takes even the time of many centuries to unpack a science of other region in the absence of a common language. First of all, you need to learn the language of the importer to export the art on your behalf. So here also hindus will have to agree that they learn arabic in full detail to convey their art and science to Arabs. If they knew arabic 2000 years earlier, then they must have documented its grammer and dailect. Let us see where is that document. A hindu must be very much proficient in Arabic due to his ancestral abilities. Now we call any hindu to please come and have a few words with us in Arabic.
They are total failure here.
4. Based on the same claim as in para 3, please show us the traits of that art and science that was exported to Arabia. Please show us some traits in Arabian peninsula.
No proof?
Means you are a liar, Mr. Oak.
5. Now Mr. Oak has thumped hsi chest to announce,
"An ancillary conclusion could be that the so-called Kutub Minar (in Delhi, India) could well be king Vikramadiya’s tower commemorating his conquest of Arabia."
The reign of vikramaditya is 600 years earlier than the revelation of Qur'an.
So how the Aayaat of the Qur'an Kareem appeared on Qutub Minar if it was built by vikrmaditya not Qutubuddin Aibak.
Another question is...
Why he built this tower in Delhi, i.e. in India. He should have built it in any city of Arabia so that they may remember that such and such a king had ruled them. These hindus are also very fond of making their memory places. It will be fitting to tell you here that every hindu king issues his own coins and that all with a new century begining from himself theryby polluting the historical dating system. The history of India is unreliable to the maximum extent throughout the world. One can reach to no conclusion based on the historical monuments of India. Mr Oak! check your own base first, comment on others later!
6. These hindu stupids are very well known for their deforming the well established Arabic root words.
They call Mahrauli as Mihira-Awali, ALLAH as ila, Rabi as ravi, Namaz as a combination of ‘Nama’ and ‘Yajna’, Shabibarat as Shiv Vrat and Shiva Ratra, Arab as Arvasthan, 786 as om in mirror image, Kabaa as Kabaalishwaran temple, Balkh as balhika.
The ancient base of all the terminology used in Islam is beyond doubt. Let me explain one by one.
Mahrauli and 786 are not associated to Islam at all. Mahrauli is a Farsi word. 786 has been generated after adding the numerical values of bismillahi rrahmani rraheem. This adding holds no singnificance in Islam.
Allah is from Ilaah which means God and this is very well established word of Arabian language.
Rabi is written as ربيع (Ra Ba Ya Ain)in Arabic which means Spring. If it had been Ra Ba Ya, any convertibility would have been thought of. But the letter Ain indicates it to be a word away from ravi which means Sun. Even the meaning are quite different. Poor unable forgerer don't even know Arabic terminology. Pity on him.
Namaz too is a Farsi word. It is known as Salah سلوت (Sad Lam Vau Ta) in Arabic. This have no match with Nama Yajna. Actually the forgerer is interpolating as per his convenience.
Shabibarat is also mis-spelled. It is a Farsi word which is Shab e Bara'at not Shabibarat. In reality the Arabic word in Islam is Lailatul Bara'at which means The Night of Guiltlessness. The word Bara'at براءة (Ba Ra Alif Hamza Ta) too is not so simple that it could be easily chopped to look like vrat or ratri.
Again the word Arab عرب is composed of Ain Ra Ba and specifically used for Arabians. The presence of Ain throws dust on the interpolators trying to call it as arv.
The word Ka'aba كعبة will slap these idolators as it is formed of Kaf Ain Ba Ta. It is much away from the dirt of kabaalishwaran. The word Balkh can not be from balhika bacaue in balhika, 'h' is prior to 'k', so it can't become 'kh'. If it would have been 'hk' thus they claiming it to be Balhk derived from balhika, something could have been thought. But its all their misfortune that it is 'Balkh' not 'Balhk'. even this word Balkh has got no Islamic significance.
Rather by illustrating such examples, hindus only turn up to say that their sanskrit was formed by deforming Arabics. Because it is more fitting to derive these word from original Arabic words.
7. It will be more benefitting if we show what is inside Ka'aba actually.
Go to YouTube and see what is inside Ka'aba.
Refutation continues...
Add a comment
| < Prev |
|---|